Протоколы для Disconnect (T3-T4)

Обсуждение на форуме, 2003 год

Maureen
I understand summing the channels and training one thing, e.g. theta, down at sites such as F3 and F4, or training 15-35 down at P3 and P4. I don't understand why one would choose summing versus difference training between two sites, especially T3 and T4, if there was a "disconnect" discovered in the assessment. If "disconnect" presents as unequal amounts of Beta and High Beta, then why not T3-T4 and train the difference?

Pete
In many cases a client will have high levels of eyes-closed beta and/or high-beta at T3 and T4--but not have a 2:1 relationship between the two sides in high-beta. The same kind of pattern often shows up in the frontals or sometimes even central areas. You can choose to train a single area or two areas in two channels. I've just found that combining the two sites provides a powerful impact. Even if I have a disconnect between T3 and T4, I am increasingly training just the high side down. However, in a number of these cases I've trained the two-sided squish. When you look at the graph of the results, the fast activity on the high side comes down significantly, while the low side doesn't drop very much at all.